<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Relevant Text Links are Not Relevant to your Site&#8217;s Success</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buyselllinks.com/2010/07/15/relevant-text-links-are-not-relevant-to-your-sites-success/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buyselllinks.com/2010/07/15/relevant-text-links-are-not-relevant-to-your-sites-success/</link>
	<description>Your High End Ranking Service</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 04:35:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fionnd</title>
		<link>http://www.buyselllinks.com/2010/07/15/relevant-text-links-are-not-relevant-to-your-sites-success/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>fionnd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buyselllinks.com/2010/07/15/relevant-text-links-are-not-relevant-to-your-sites-success/#comment-766</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you.  I have seen sites rank with complete garbage in the last few months. Foreign social media sites that are nothing less than link farms with no other content on them except links to the targetted sites.  I have seen one URL rank wih 45 links from blogs using the exact same content run through a content generator with a word changed here and there.  I did file a spam report with Google and the result has gone that is very encouraging. I wont go down that route for ourselves or our clients I am hoping that Google are working on this and will fix it and we can go back to more sanity.  
Google has been very busy in the past year with major updates but knowing Google I cannot see this siutation lasting too long despite how much we moan about them they really do care  about the quality of their results and the role links play in that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you.  I have seen sites rank with complete garbage in the last few months. Foreign social media sites that are nothing less than link farms with no other content on them except links to the targetted sites.  I have seen one URL rank wih 45 links from blogs using the exact same content run through a content generator with a word changed here and there.  I did file a spam report with Google and the result has gone that is very encouraging. I wont go down that route for ourselves or our clients I am hoping that Google are working on this and will fix it and we can go back to more sanity.<br />
Google has been very busy in the past year with major updates but knowing Google I cannot see this siutation lasting too long despite how much we moan about them they really do care  about the quality of their results and the role links play in that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO e MDR</title>
		<link>http://www.buyselllinks.com/2010/07/15/relevant-text-links-are-not-relevant-to-your-sites-success/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO e MDR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buyselllinks.com/2010/07/15/relevant-text-links-are-not-relevant-to-your-sites-success/#comment-751</guid>
		<description>I do not think it makes sense to buy links, especially if they are not at issue with our website. If you intend to buy and do on sites subject to long periods of time, If you buy a link for one month only Google understand everything easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think it makes sense to buy links, especially if they are not at issue with our website. If you intend to buy and do on sites subject to long periods of time, If you buy a link for one month only Google understand everything easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

